When I was a young man, we went to the Manti Temple to
do Baptisms for the Dead. Manti is an
old temple. It was completed after the St. George and Logan temples, but
before the Salt lake Temple. It is an
impressive building and sits on a hill above town so that it is the dominant
feature in the valley. What I remember about the inside is that
everything was big there. We went in the
massive front doors and down a big hallway, then down a big, wide staircase to
the basement where the font was.
Nowadays, there is an exterior door to the baptistry there, so YM and YW
don’t have to walk through the main door.
When we got to the baptismal font, it, too, was big. Maybe it’s just that I was small, but I was
impressed with how big everything was.
Our trips to Manti had some other things that
impressed me greatly.
First: I got to take sack lunch, and Mom put a twinkie
inside. Twinkies were unusual for me –
I think I got maybe three all the time until I was earning my own money and
could buy whatever I could afford. We
didn’t often buy treats in our house.
Mom made as much as she could from scratch: bread, butter, cookies, etc. She even saved fat so she could make lye
soap, which she grated and used as laundry soap. We butchered our own Meat, which came either
from hunting, or animals we bought directly from the local farmers who raised
them. So, a twinkie automatically put that
temple sack lunch in the memorable department, and to this day I have a special
feeling for them, although I seldom choose to eat any.
Second: While waiting, after our turn in the font, we got to
roll down the hill between the temple and the hiway. The hill by the temple is steep so it made
for good rolling. The thrill of it was
that at the bottom of the hill was a wall about 5’ high and if you didn’t stop
in time you’d roll right off it, and at
the bottom of the drop you were in the hiway!
Nowadays they’ve put in a fence and ruined it. You never see kids rolling down that hill
now. But isn’t that a silly thing to
remember doing?
But,
of course the work we did there was the reason we went. I was very aware of why we were there. The
difference between then and now is that I didn’t know any of the
people whose work we did. Not one. Today, the YM and YW should be doing baptisms
for family who have passed on, their own ancestors if possible, or ancestors of
people they know. That makes the work
much more significant. Our YM and YW
today should be remembering who they did work for, not what they had for lunch,
or the thrills they had while waiting outside afterward, like I did.
The
temple is a place where we tie families together for eternity. That is the reason why we build and maintain
temples. That is the reason why we can
ask for 6-8 volunteers to go vacuum the temple every night, and have our busy
members respond to the call. I got to vacuum
the temple just last Wednesday. It was
an honor to do it. We try to keep the
temple spotless, just as we wash ourselves and prepare ourselves spiritually
before we go to do the work. The
preparation of making ourselves clean, helps us remember and understand the significance and holiness of
the work we do there. And, clenaing the temple prepares it so we can focus onthe work.
I’m going to share another funny story. On December 9th, 1970, Liz and I
got in a car with her parents and my grandfather. We drove for 80 miles to Manti, where Liz and I both
received our endowments in preparation for our temple marriage the next
day. Liz’s family were converts to the
church while I have pioneer ancestors, but in many ways she was more prepared
than I, because her parents were both dedicated to the church and endowed,
while my father never became LDS and my mother was not permitted to take out
her endowments because her husband couldn’t go.
(That policy has been changed, and she later did get her endowments) We never
talked about the temple endowment experience in my home because none of us had any experience with it.
As we drove to the temple that day, my grandfather was
with me, as my closest endowed family member, to escort me through the temple knowing that the endowment can be a bit overwhelming. But I don’t think he appreciated how
painfully ignorant I really was on that day.
As the endowment began, the man officiating said
something to the effect that we would be taking on ourselves sacred covenants. He emphasized that they were extremely sacred
covenants, and that anyone who was not willing to accept those covenants should
raise their hand. I was surprised at
that. How did I know whether I was
willing to accept them when I had no idea what they were?!?
In a moment of near-panic I looked around to see how
many other people were going to raise
their hand.
At that moment, my grandfather put his hand on my knee
and leaned over to say, “It’ll be OK.”
With the reassurance of that kind old man, who I loved dearly, I calmed
down and indeed, everything was OK. As
I learned about the covenants, I realized they were the same things I had
learned about in my church classes all my life.
I was happy to accept and commit to each one of them. The
next day was the highlight of my life as my wife and I were married in the
temple.
Today, Liz and I, and our daughter are at the temple
every week as temple workers. It is a
wonderful experience to be there as helpers and officiators, and doing it with
our daughter is especially sweet. One of
the most special experiences we have there is when faithful men and women go
for their first time and we get to help them along. Some of them are well prepared and breeze
through it easily, while some have that “deer in the headlights” look like I
did on my first time. It works either
way, but it is best if they are well prepared.
After that first time, we all do work for the dead,
and just as with baptisms, it is a wonderful experience to do the work for
people we know, especially our own family.
When I was a young man, about 137 years ago –
approximately - the church was encouraging everyone to record
a 4-generation chart of their family. My
older brother had done one, and I mostly copied his, however,
I dutifully talked to my grandparents to make sure I had it right. On my Mother’s side of the family, I found
what many other descendants of the pioneers find – that somebody had already
done the pedigrees - far back, and well.
I felt there was nothing left for me to do, there. That is an illusion, but it is how I
felt.
But on my Father’s side of the family it was virgin
territory. He was not LDS and nobody had
done anything in the way of genealogy.
That sounded like a bit more fun
- but not enough to actually do anything about it at that time. I was still a young man, after all.
So I finished high school and went off to BYU. I served a hitch as a U.S. Marine part way
through my college work and came back to BYU as a married student. I finished up my degree in Zoology and
chemistry in December, 1975 and headed off to Arizona for my first job as an agricultural
biologist. At that time, they didn’t
pass out diplomas when you finished your degree in December like I had, so when
I got a fat letter from the Y in the mail, I thought it would be my
diploma. To my surprise, it was a copy
of my transcript and a notice that I needed two more hours of coursework before
I could expect a degree. Any two hours,
in any subject, would do the trick.
Well, I was disappointed, to say the least. I was living out in remote NE Arizona about
30 feet from the edge of the Navajo Reservation, and there was no way I was
getting back to Provo
for a 2 hour class.
But wait! There
are correspondence classes. (For you young people, that's what we had before we had the internet.) I called BYU
and had them send me a course book. I
found that the Religion Department had a class in Genealogical Research that
was 2 hours. It sounded kind of
interesting, so I sent in my registration and fee.
Mostly I was retrieving microfilm records from SLC
that had been photographed from the county courthouse in Paris, Kentucky where
my great-grandparents were born. It took
2-3 weeks to get a copy of the microfilm, and some of them turned out to be useless while others had information I could use. I found many good
marriage and death records, which, when combined with census records let me
build up my pedigree back to the revolutionary war. So that was fun.
What I could not find was any birth records in Paris , KY ,
so I was using estimates based on census records for birth dates, and that
isn’t very accurate. That bothered
me. It still does. I’d like to find better dates.
That pure research of the Ashurst family line was in
1976. I sent copies of my pedigree to Salt Lake . I left copies in the Arizona
State genealogy library in Phoenix , and later in the courthouse in Paris , Kentucky . I gave copies to my grandfather’s
brother. Of course, I also gave them to
my siblings and my children. Many, many
people have taken that beginning and used it as the basis for their own
research on Ashurst ancestors. I often
find where my early work has been copied or referenced.
So, I finished my class and graduated from BYU.
But there was a problem with doing the temple work for
one of my ancestors. William
Ashurst. There are records indicating
that he might have been born in 1806, 1812, 1818, or 1823. That’s confusing! I suspect he had a cousin with the same name,
but I don’t know for sure, yet. And he seemed too young to be a
child of his parents. In today’s online
genealogy programs, people keep deleting his connection to the family because
it doesn’t seem to fit. I knew he fit in
our line somewhere because he lived in the house built by his father and passed
down to my later ancestors, but I was reluctant to do his work without nailing
it down better. I wondered if I had
missed a generation – if he was a grandson, instead of son. It took me 40 some years of anxiety about him
before I finally located court records that clarified it. He was pretty young to be in his
family, but not impossibly so. It turned
out that he was a late child. One of
those special babies born to parents who had thought they were past
child-bearing age. His siblings were all
much older than he was, almost in another generation.
The record I found was a court record where his aging father arranged to
have William’s next older brother legally appointed as his guardian, with the
family home left to him in care of his guardian. And his father also specified that William
was to be responsible for his mother, who also lived in the house. So that record tied it all up and specified
his relationship to his parents and one sibling, and even gave his age, making him born in 1812. Yeah!
Doing the temple work for William after all these
years wondering if I’d gotten the line correct, was a wonderful experience, and
I completed it last year. I was kind of
giddy as I carried the little card with his data on it and completed the
ordinances. When I sealed him to his
parents I had some trouble with tears in my eyes.
Doing the work for someone like that is extremely
rewarding, and it has gotten much easier to do it. We no longer have to wait weeks to get poor
quality microfilm copies of records, and our computers help us put families
together correctly. These days more and
more people are bringing their own family names into the temple to do the work,
and people have those same kinds of feelings as I had, when they do the work
for people in their own families
This is the work we are charged to do as part of being
among those privileged to live in the latter days, and enjoying the fullness of the
gospel.
Part of preparing to go to the temple should involve
looking for ancestors who need their work done.
And doing family work increases our own spiritual understanding of the
work, and helps us appreciate what a blessing it is to be able to do temple
work.
It is a great work, and I pray that we may be able to do all that is
needful to be done .
In the name of . . . . .